The online home of the Greenhorn Valley View
 Home | News | Sports | Ideas | Life | Classifieds | Service Directory | Outdoors | The Greenhorn Valley |
Quick Links: My View | Happenings | Weather | Local News | Service Directory | Coupons | Display Ads | My View - Log In | Register
Wednesday, November 20, 2019
Fire conditions brought to you by RFPD:  Click here to get emergency text and email alerts
Ad Here

Letter to the Editor: National Popular Vote
TalkbackComment on this story  |   RecommendRecommend this story  |   Print it!Printer friendly version  |   Email itEmail this story to a friend

Adjust story text size: Make font size smaller Make font size larger

Other stories in this category
11/4/2019 10/23/2019 10/30/2019

Click here for all the news

Most recommended in this category

Click here for all the news

There has been some press, including in your newspaper, that suggests that Colorado’s adoption of the National Popular Vote bill—now the law in Colorado—is somehow in violation of the U.S. Constitution. Some people now seem intent on recalling Governor Polis for his having signed the bill into law, which bill, of course, was adopted by our elected representatives.

There seems to be an agenda to claim that the law is an end-run around the U.S. Constitution. It is an interstate compact that would guarantee the presidency to the candidate who receives the most popular votes in all 50 states and the District of Columbia.

The law is no end-run around the U.S. Constitution. The U.S. Constitution gives state legislatures exclusive control over awarding their states’ electoral votes. Most states (48) have recently operated on a winner-take-all basis: this awards all of a state’s electoral votes to the candidate receiving the most popular votes in the state. Two states (Maine, Nebraska) have allocated electoral votes by how their congressional districts voted.

The National Popular Vote bill ensures that no Coloradan would be disenfranchised in presidential elections: every Coloradan’s vote would count, nationwide, even those votes cast for the candidate who came in out of first place in Colorado. Under winner-take-all, if you vote for any but the first-place candidate in Colorado, then you really are disenfranchised.

The electoral college is an anachronism, its failures to meet Founding Fathers’ expectations evident even in the early 19th century. Their expectations included wanting to avoid the creation of “cabals” (now known as political parties), and to prevent foreign corruption. They expected Congress, not the electoral college, to decide presidential elections most of the time.

They were wrong. Presidential elections are now nationwide, basically contests between two political parties, and should be treated as such. Today, I am confident that those Fathers would agree.

Would you like to read the rest of this story? You can subscribe to the Greenhorn Valley View for only $35/yr. anywhere in Pueblo County. Call 676-3401 for more information.

Click here to log in to post to TalkBack
Click on the cop Report Talk Back Abuse to report Talk Back abuse and misuse

Featured Auto Ad
Click here to advertise in this space

My View
Free ice cream!
Set up alerts
Subscribe to lists
Participate in forums and talk-back
Set preferences
Log in
Sign up

Ad Here

Ads by Google

Home | Contact us | Archives | E-Edition | My View | Privacy Policy | Subscribe to the print edition
Site Map

The Greenhorn Valley View is a weekly newspaper serving the communities of the Greenhorn Valley in Southern Colorado,
including Colorado City, Rye, San Isabel, Beulah and Hatchet Ranch.

All content Copyright © 2003 - 2019 Speckled Pup Media and/or other copyright holders. All rights reserved.